A list of 55 documents from the Army and external sources pertaining to the role of an individual in unit performance were collected. The author, keywords, potential for use in our analyses, detailed document description, date written, and notes were collected to guide the document selection process. The chart below shows one example of how a document was annotated. [1]
The 10 documents most relevant to teams and leadership in the Army, as well as academic writing on team science, spanning the last 50 years were chosen for further analysis. [2]
Selected Documents
ADP 6-22: Army Leadership and the Profession
AR-623-23: Performance Evaluation Guide - Leadership Requirements Model and Example Behavioral Indicators
Building Cohesive Teams Handbook
FM 6-22: Leader Development
Leaders Guide to Team Building Handbooks
PAM 600-3: Officer Professional Development and Career Management
PAM 623-3: Evaluation Reporting System
TC 7-21.13: Soldier’s Guide
The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and Team Building Success
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor
We reviewed seven types of administrative documents officially published by the Army Department of Army Authenticated Publications:
Army Directive (AD)
Army Regulation (AR)
Department of the Army (DA) pamphlet (PAM)
Army Doctrine Publications (ADP)
Handbook
Field Manual (FM)
Training Circulars (TC)
In order to compare how individual factors relevant to team success might differ between Army and civilian teams, we also included two non-Army documents in our analysis.
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor
The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and Team Building Success
There was a total of 320 excerpts coded within the ten documents used in the qualitative analysis. [3]
Document Discovery: Documents highlighted with green indicate that they may be relevant to the research topic. Documents highlighted with yellow are the 10 documents used in the qualitative analysis.